Syllabus
Econ 580, Spring 2009
Prof. Andrés Rodríguez-Clare
Background
reading:
·
William
Easterly, The Elusive Quest for Growth, MIT Press
·
David
Weill, Economic Growth, Pearson Addison Wesley Press
You
should also be comfortable with the Neoclassical Growth Model. A good reference
is David Romer, Advanced Macroeconomics, chapter 1 (up to section 1.7) and
chapter 2 (only part A). You should be able to answer the following questions:
What drives long run growth in the Solow model? What are the key determinants
of the steady state income level? What happens to consumption in steady state
if the savings rate increases? What is the golden-rule level of the capital
stock? What is the relationship between the share of income going to capital
and the elasticity of steady state income per capita w.r.t.
s? What does it mean to say that the speed of convergence is 4%? How is this
obtained? Can we explain differences in income levels across countries with the
Solow model? Why or why not? What is the implication of the Solow model for
convergence across countries? Is this satisfied in the data? Can you think of a
simple reason for this failure of the model?
What is the implication of the Solow model regarding the direction of
the capital flows? Is this satisfied in the data? With endogenous savings, will
the economy be at the golden-rule level of the capital stock?
Introduction
·
Acemoglu,
Chapter 1
·
Pritchett,
“Divergence,
Big Time”
·
Lucas,
“Some
Macroeconomics for the 21st Century”
Neoclassical theories of international income
differences
·
Klenow and Rodríguez-Clare, 1997, "The Neoclassical Revival in Growth
Economics: Has It Gone Too Far?" NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1997,
B. Bernanke and J. Rotemberg ed.,
· Restuccia and Rogerson, “Policy Distortions in Aggregate Productivity with Heterogenous Establishments,” Review of Economic Dynamics
Endogenous
technology: implications for growth and income differences
·
Romer, 1990, "Endogenous
Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy,
·
Jones, 2005, “Growth and Ideas,”
in P. Aghion and
· Córdoba and Ripoll, 2005, “Endogenous TFP and Cross-Country Income Differences”, JME 2008
The
Industrial Revolution
· * Becker, Murphy and Tamura, 1990, “Human Capital, Fertility, and Economic Growth,” JPE
· Kremer, 1993, “Population Growth and Technical Change” One Million B.C. to 1990,” QJE
· Lucas, The Industrial Revolution: Past and Present
· Hansen and Prescott, “Malthus to Solow” AER
· * O’Rourke, Rahman and Taylor, “Trade, Knowledge and the Industrial Revolution”
· Galor, “From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory,” Handbook Paper
Models of
technology adoption
· * Manuelli and Sheshadri, “Frictionless Technology Diffusion: The Case of Tractors”
· Chari, V. V. & Hopenhayn, H. (1991), ‘Vintage human capital, growth, and the diffusion of new technology’, Journal of Political Economy 99(6), 1142–65.
· Matthias Kredler, “Experience vs Obsolescence: A Vintage Human Capital Model”
· Atkeson and Kehoe, “Modeling the Transition to a New Economy: Lessons from Two Technological Revolutions”
· * Caselli, “Technological Revolutions”
Multinationals and development (skip)
· Antras, Garicano and Rossi-Hansberg, “Offshoring in a Knowledge Economy”
· * Dasgupta, “Learning, Knowledge Diffusion, and the Gains from Globalization”
Industrialization, Geography,
Structural Change
· Murphy, Shleifer and Vishny, 1989, “Industrialization and the Big Push,” JPE
· Krugman and Venables, 1995, “Globalization and the Inequality of Nations,” QJE
· Krugman, “The Role of Geography in Economic Development”
· Acemoglu, Part VII
Political
Economy of Development
· Buera, Monge and Primiceri, “Learning the Wealth of Nations”
· Acemoglu, Part VIII